Soil investigation and model
Reduce four-pin field measurements to apparent resistivity, fit a two-, three- or four-layer earth model (IEEE Std 81-2025 §7.3, §7.6), and derive the equivalent uniform resistivity used by the closed-form IEEE 80 equations.
Survey data
| # | Pin spacing a (m)? | ρₐ (Ω·m)? | R (Ω)? | Traverse? |
|---|
Model options
Apparent resistivity curvemeasured vs fitted
Section through the modelled soilto scale
Model and residuals
Earth-fault current
Line-to-earth fault current to IEC 60909-0, then the maximum grid current IG = Df·Sf·Cp·3I₀ of IEEE Std 80-2013 clause 15.
Source data
Grid current factors
Shield wires and fault location
IEEE Std 80-2013 clause 15.9 and Annex C: the fault current that returns through the soil — and so raises the grid — is what the shield wire of the line does not carry back. Here the shield wire and tower footings of one outgoing line are solved as a ladder, with the voltage the phase current induces in the shield wire, and the fault is moved along the line: a fault at the first towers outside the station often puts more current into the grid than one inside it.
Cable sheaths — earth-fault return
A substation fed by cable: for an earth fault at the far end the fault current returns partly in the cable sheaths and armour and partly through the soil — only the soil part raises the earth. The sheaths are solved as a ladder between the two end earths and any earthed joints or link boxes, with the faulted core inducing its voltage in every section (ENA EREC S34 Appendix D generalised). The result is the split factor of the cable, the earth current and potential at each end and the voltage of every joint.
Results
Decrement factor vs fault duration
Grid current along the lineshield-wire ladder
Earthing conductor sizing
Thermal sizing to IEEE Std 80-2013 Eq. (37)/(45) and the IEC 60364-5-54 adiabatic equation, plus the minimum sizes required by IEC 60364-5-54 Tables 54.1 and 54.2.
Design current
Material and joints
Results
Required area vs fault duration
Substation / power-plant earth grid — IEEE Std 80-2013
The complete design procedure of Figure 33: tolerable voltages, grid resistance (Sverak and Schwarz), ground potential rise, mesh and step voltages, and automatic refinement until the design complies.
Site and safety data
Grid geometry
Compliance
Grid layout
Section through the gridsurface layer, burial depth, spacing, rods
Mesh and step voltage vs conductor spacing
All computed quantities
Numerical analysis — boundary-element solver
Arbitrary electrode geometry in uniform or layered soil (up to four layers), or two soils side by side across a vertical boundary. The buried metal is discretised into segments held at a common potential; solving for the leakage-current distribution gives the true earth resistance, the surface potential field and the touch and step voltages everywhere — without the shape restrictions of the closed-form equations.
Soil and current
Electrode geometry
| Element | Parameters |
|---|
Import from a DXF site drawing
Reads an ASCII DXF of the earthing layout. Lines and polylines on a conductor layer become buried conductors (arcs as chords), circles there become rings; points, small circles and blocks on a rod layer become driven rods; each polyline on a fence layer becomes a fence. The unit is taken from the drawing ($INSUNITS) unless a scale is given.
Transferred potential
A pipe, rail, cable screen or bare earth wire that leaves the station carries part of its potential rise out (IEEE Std 80 clause 17.3). The conductor has series impedance with earth return and leaks into the soil. A bare or coated conductor is solved together with the station, so its own leakage changes the soil potential round the station and beside the route; an insulated screen or a rail is solved as a lossy line driven by the bond and by the soil potential the station imposes along the route. It uses the soil, current and electrodes above.
Lightning response
The electrodes above under a lightning current, solved in the frequency domain as thin wires in a lossy half-space (the electromagnetic model of the Theory & reference page, §10.7). It gives the harmonic impedance, the potential rise for a first and a subsequent stroke, and the impulse coefficient, in uniform or layered soil, with or without soil ionisation. Concrete foundations are included with their concrete.
Accuracy and soil studies
Each study re-solves the electrodes and soil above. The convergence check halves the segments and estimates the converged values. The seasonal study replaces the top of the soil by a dry or frozen layer. The uncertainty study draws soil models from the fitted model's covariance (page 1) and gives the spread of the results and the probability of meeting the limits.
Conductor impedance — non-equipotential solution
The solver above holds all buried metal at one potential. A large grid, steel conductors or low soil resistivity break that: the fault current enters at one point and loses voltage along the conductors. This solves the same electrodes at power frequency with the conductors' internal impedance and their self and mutual inductance with earth return and compares the result with the equipotential one. Fences are solved too: their posts and buried wire leak current, the fabric joins them above ground, and a bonded fence is connected to the grid node nearest to it.
Optimise the grid
Searches for the cheapest rectangular grid that meets the tolerable touch and step voltages of the grid page, using this solver and the soil above: the number of conductors, unequal spacing drawn towards the edges (where a uniform grid's mesh voltages are highest), and rods on the perimeter. The result can be loaded into the electrode table.
Fall-of-potential test
IEEE Std 81 clause 8. Plans the test of the electrodes above — how far out the current electrode must go and where the potential probe must stand — and, with the readings, interprets it. The test current is injected into the electrodes and returned through a driven rod; the whole curve R(x) is computed for this geometry and soil, so the 61.8 % rule is checked rather than assumed.
Earth-surface potential
Potential surface
Touch voltage (GPR − Vsurface)
Potential, touch and step voltage along a traverse
Leakage current per segment
Electrode geometry (3-D)
Electrodes in the soil section
Results
Governing values — the verdict of this page
The checks that decide whether the design complies. For each quantity the largest value from the solution above and from every study run on the same electrodes, soil and current is taken — the convergence check, seasonal soil, the 95th percentile of the soil-uncertainty study and the non-equipotential solution — and the study it came from is named. A study run before the electrodes or soil were changed is listed as out of date and left out. The design report and the drawing stamp use these values. They update by themselves after every solution and study.
Buildings and homes — IEC 60364 / BS 7671
Earth electrode selection, protective conductor sizing, earth-fault loop impedance, maximum disconnection times and RCD selection for TN-S, TN-C-S, TT and IT installations.
Installation
Protective device
Earth electrodes
| Type | Parameters | R (Ω) |
|---|
Compliance
Details
Electrode section
Electrode resistance vs soil resistivity
Earth pit — electrode in low-resistivity backfill
Pit
Backfill
Group, loading and housing
Earth pit results
Pit resistance vs hole diameter
Lightning protection earth termination — IEC 62305-3
LPS class parameters, the minimum electrode length l₁ from Figure 3, Type A and Type B earth terminations, down-conductor spacing and the separation distance s.
Structure and LPS
Risk management — IEC 62305-2:2024
The 2024 edition's single risk R = RL1 + RL2 (injury to people and physical damage) against RT = 10⁻⁵ per year, and the frequency of damage F of internal systems against the FT you set, both zone by zone. The least LPS class, entrance bonding SPDs and coordinated SPDs that meet both are found; the LPS class can then be used for the earth termination above.
Surge protection — IEC 62305-4
Selection and coordination of the SPDs at the service entrance and the sub-board: the impulse current each Type 1 SPD must take, the effective protection level with its connecting leads, the protection condition at the equipment and the decoupling length between stages.
Compliance
Details
Minimum electrode length l₁ vs soil resistivity
Under the lightning impulse — effective length and effective area
What the front actually reaches
Effective radius versus front time
Air termination and protection zone — IEC 62305-3
Where the flash is intercepted, and which volume that interception actually protects. The rolling sphere is rolled numerically over the structure and the terminations, so the result holds for any arrangement; the protective angle and the mesh method are shown beside it for comparison.
Structure
Air terminations
| x (m) | y (m) | Height (m) | Base (m) |
|---|
Compliance
Rolling sphere — elevation
Protected area — plan
Protective angle method
Mesh method — roof plan
All computed quantities
System neutral grounding — IEEE Std 142
Choose between solid, low-resistance, high-resistance, reactance and ungrounded systems; size the neutral earthing resistor; check whether the system is effectively grounded for surge-arrester selection.
System
Results
Grounding method comparison
Design report
Assemble every module that has been run into one printable document, in English or Persian. Charts are captured from the modules and embedded in the report.
Document details
Sections included
Preview
Construction drawings
Turn the design into a drawing set for the contractor and the manufacturers: register and general notes, earth-grid layout plan, typical sections, earth pit, main earthing terminal, connection and bonding details, conductor selection chart, lightning earth termination, earthing schematics and the bill of materials. Sheets follow ISO 5457 / ISO 7200 / ISO 128; every installation rule on them is checked and quoted with its clause.
Title block
Drafting options
Sheets
Preview
Design-rule verification of the drawings
Bill of materials
Theory — the physics and mathematics behind every page
The complete teaching companion: where each equation comes from, the derivations,
worked examples, and how to read a verdict. The same text is in
docs/THEORY.md, and docs/METHODS.md is the condensed
equation reference.